This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IraqWikipedia:WikiProject IraqTemplate:WikiProject IraqIraq
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
U.S. District Court Judge Harold Baer, Jr. (2003). "Opinion and Order"(PDF). United States District Court, Southern District of New York. Retrieved 2006-09-10.
[http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=34147 Saddam and bin Laden] by Joseph Farah, August 18, 2003
I think it is strange to see 2 separate Background sections. The first one is alright but the second one seems wholly unnecessary. The first sentence deals with Saddam invoking religion for political purposes, completely unrelated to Al-Qaeda link allegations. The second paragraph deals with the Feith Memo, which has its own subsection anyway. It also mentions the Prague meeting, which is also discussed later on. The details about the camp at Salman Pak can be moved to the subsection on the 2002 DIA report. The final paragraph with Mubarak al-Duri can be moved up to Conflicting Ideologies. It might also be cleaner to create a subsection under Skepticism specifically detailing the unreliability of defectors' testimony. I will play around with this in a sandbox and see if I can get something looking nice. SatelliteOrbit (talk | contribs) 17:46, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Longhornsg, both articles are sufficiently long on first glance. However, if you think that the quotes in the timeline article are too long, I would recommend editing it to conform with WP standards and then seeing if the articles could still stand to be merged. This will also have the effect of improving the encyclopedia. In any case, the merge process strongly recommends editing be done in a different edit than the actual merge, so editing it now would help comply with that guideline. JuxtaposedJacob (talk) | :) | he/him | 07:58, 21 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]